Approaches to Management and Organizational Behaviour...

205KM Management and Organizational Behaviour Report 1 Title: Approaches to Management and Organizational Behaviour: Pizza Hut and McDonald’s (Fill in the Name of Company A) (Fill in the Name of Company B) Student Name: HSU Ka Syn Syrus Student ID: 51878875 Tutorial Group: 2 Table of Contents Page Num 1. Objectives | 9 | 2. Business Background | 9 | 3. Organization Structure and Design 3.1 Organization Structure of Company A3.2 Organization Structure of Company B3.3 Compare the Similarities and Differences of Organization Structure between Company A amp; B | 10101214 | 4. Approaches to Management amp; Organizational†¦show more content†¦3 Organization Structure and Design 4.1 Organization Structure of Pizza Hut Figure1. Hierarchy Division of Pizza Hut: Supervisor: A supervisor is a team leader in a position of trust in business. He / She always are an assistant to Manager. They have possession of part of the manager power, such as the allocation of the daily workflow, and void order of power. Restaurant General Manager: Restaurant General Manager is responsible for all problem of the restaurant. Not just manage all employees, but also they need to manage restaurant facilitates and service quality etc. In addition, they need to set daily sales target to fulfill organization goal. Operations Manager: They responsible for ensure that business needs to use as few resources as possible to meet customer requirements efficiently and effectively. Moreover, they need to establish operation policy to all operations department staff, included all restaurants manager. Chief executive officer: is the highest-ranking corporate officer (executive) or administrator in charge of total management of an organization. An individual appointed as a CEO of a corporation, company, organization, or agency typically reports to the board of directors. At present, Hong Kong Pizza Hut chief executive officer is Henry Yip. Figure2. Functional Division of Pizza Hut: Finance department: Finance department is often simply defined as money management or

Programmed To Be Free Exploring Andrew Niccols Gatacca...

Programmed To Be Free Gatacca by Andrew Niccol tells the story of Vincent, a young man naturally and traditionally engendered in a world where genetic engineering is the followed pattern to have a child. Few minutes after his birth, Vincent’s fate is revealed through a DNA analysis. Two important facts in the analysis will mark Vincent’s life, a fail in his cardio system and his life expectancy, only thirty years. The film shows a world where life is highly determined by genetics, and happiness is mostly based on the quality of the genetic profile, a kind of identity card for people. Vincent, who wants to become an astronaut and work for Gattaca, a company that launches rockets to the out space, overcomes all the difficulties present in†¦show more content†¦It is a strong and virtually universal perception, but, as been illustrated here, this perception is subject to manipulation and illusion.† However, genetic profile is based on probabilities and this g ives space to the defenses of the free will and of course, a hope to Vincent. The defendants of the free will argue that actions are not subjected to any casual forces. Creativity is a main reason to believe in free will. Creativity requires of a reflection capacity, and reflection processes involve spans of more than ten seconds. In order to fulfill his goals, Vincent makes a display of creativity that defies any deterministic theory. The very first scenes of the movie show all the strategies that Vincent makes to infiltrate into Gattaca. He brushes his body vigorously to get rid of any particles of dead skin, produces small blood bags that puts under a fake fingertip, attaches one bag of urine to his leg, which is not his own, to pass the analysis of the company. All of these actions would represent what Sartre called free will. This creativity is far beyond of the stimuli – response model that Skiner proposed. Vincent has capacity of reflection that an animal has not. On t he other hand, Sartre says that, what makes us what we are, is the experience. This is point of view, called existentialism, brings essence to the human being and Vincent represents the perfect example of a person who is made by himself. Vincent, says

Rebellion of 1837 Free Essays

Dannicah S. Blk 2. 3 Rebellion of 1837 After learning about the rebellion of 1837 and constantly taking notes, I realized the rebellion was not successful in overturning the government but it did unite both Upper and Lower Canada together. We will write a custom essay sample on Rebellion of 1837 or any similar topic only for you Order Now This was able to take away any differences of the two cultures, English and French. The impact did not happen immediately as intended though. In fact it caused the government to get back at the reformers and concentrate more on their punishment such as transportation, hanging, flogging and deaths for the rebels, instead of working on fixing the colony. You can tell that Canada had a serious political problem that was in desperate need to be improved. When the Chateau Clique and the reformers squared off against each other, the British did nothing to ease tension. They appointed James Craig, an anti-French as governor just to arrest those who criticized the government and brought soldiers to intimidate the French. The French Canadians disapproved of the British democracy and found it very difficult to accept. There were numerous reasons why many French Canadians resented the government. Three important ones were because of how discriminative economically and politically the government was of their language and culture, how they were given unequal taxation, and for their lack in power over the government. Although, this all happened in Lower Canada. The rebellion in Upper Canada was to bring an American style democracy because they, as well as the people in Lower Canada, believed that their government were discriminative against the French. The reason why I believe the rebellion in both Lower and Upper Canada was unsuccessful because they did not have any reasonable impact on any British colonies immediately. To begin with, the Rebellion in Upper Canada failed miserably because of their lack of military experience. Many rebellions were killed during battle and several were arrested. Some even fled to America, they were no match for the British. This rebellion would have been more successful if the Catholic Church participated but church leaders advised parishioners to stay loyal to the British. The rebellion in Lower Canada ended quickly. The rebellion in Upper Canada also did not turn out so good as well since the British military overpowered them. Even though Mackenzie, leader of the Upper Canada rebellion, took time to train his rebels and plan, the whole event all just led to deaths and arrest of many patriots. Mackenzie also escaped to America where he gained supporters there. In the end the British government continued to rule of Canada where they focused on discussing major punishment for the rebels. In my opinion, the leaders who led the rebellion of both Upper and Lower Canada were very similar. They could motivate emotions with words but they had no idea how to organize their supporters into affective forces. Eventually, Britain’s ways of administrating the colonies would have to change. John Lambton, the Earl of Durham, a reformer politician, realized the whole cause of the rebellion was the conflict between the English and French. He then proposed that Upper and Lower Canada should be united. In conclusion, the whole Rebellion was not successful as planned since the impact did not happen immediately but when Lower and Upper Canada was united it developed a new country. However, both leaders of the Rebellion returned to Canada eventually and were considered heroes by some and other as troublemakers. How to cite Rebellion of 1837, Essay examples

Hamlet Drama Essay Example For Students

Hamlet Drama Essay To die, would be to abandon this garden suffocated by weeds. To take one’s life, is to alleviate turmoil from the heart. Although extremely tempting, Hamlet cannot, therefore will not commit suicide. For he believes God â€Å"had†¦ fixed / his canon ‘gainst self-slaughter! † (line 131-132 p. 166). With this in his mind he drags his burden deeper and deeper into a pit of agony. Inflicted upon him were the excruciatingly painful blows of his father’s death and the incestuous marriage of his mother and uncle. Hamlet held his father with high esteem calling him an excellent king and Hyperion. He resents his â€Å"more than kin, and less than kind† (line 65 p. 165) stepfather, exclaiming, â€Å"So excellent a king, that was, to this! / Hyperion to a satyr† (line 139-140 p. 166). He not only shows resentment towards his uncle, Claudius, but is also beset with anguish over his mother’s hasty marriage, crying out, â€Å"She married O, most wicked speed, to post / with such dexterity to incestuous sheets! / It is not nor it cannot come to good: / But break, my heart† (line 166-169 p. 67). Then, the spirit of King Hamlet visits Elsinor to reveal to his son, â€Å"the serpent that did sting thy father’s life now wears his crown. † (lines 39-40 p. 172). The spirit asks, â€Å"If thou didst ever the dear father love – revenge his foul and most unnatural murder. Hamlet must avenge his father’s unnatural and horrible death! He swears to revenge but delays his vengeance missing opportunities one right after the other. In the Shakespearean play, Hamlet, the conflict comes from Hamlet’s Christian and moral beliefs and his need to avenge his father’s murder. Instead of storming into Claudius’ room to kill him after hearing what the ghost revealed, Hamlet must discover first-hand whether or not the ghost is telling the truth of who he is and if his story is factual. He says, â€Å"The spirit that I have seen / may be the devil: and the devil hath power / to assume a pleasing shape; yea, and perhaps / out of my weakness and my melancholy, / As he is very potent with such spirits, / abuses me to damn me† (line 632-637 p. 188). Hamlet’s Christian belief is that the devil can fix its disposition to take advantage of a person’s weakness to abuse them. This causes a delay in that he must make a plan and carry out the plan in order to verify the ghost’s accusations of Claudius and his death. Hamlet meets with players and decides he will have them act out something like the murder of his father and observe his uncle’s reaction. â€Å"I’ll tent him to the quick: if he but blench, I know my course, †¦ I’ll have grounds more relative than this: the play’s the thing wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the king. † Hamlet now has tools for his revenge: a plan, but still contemplates suicide. This is evident in his third soliloquy, saying, â€Å"To be or not to be: that is the question:†¦to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or†¦ by opposing end them: To die: to sleep:†¦ by a sleep to say we end the heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks†¦shuffled off this mortal coil. † (line 56-67). This is Hamlet’s greatest inner conflict. He does not want anything to do with this world. He wants to leave his afflictions and fall to the eternal peaceful sleep but in his Christian belief God damns those who commit â€Å"self-slaughter†. In this soliloquy Hamlet shows a lack of self-motivation. He is overcome by so much turmoil that he doesn’t want to do anything, not even avenge his father’s murder but to just die and leave his problems behind. Hamlet’s mood swings into revenge mode as he sees Claudius’ revealing countenance as he watches the play titled, Mouse-trap, that Hamlet requested especially for him. By Claudius’ reaction to the play the ghost’s story is verified to be true. After the play he searches for Claudius and finds him in â€Å"prayer† or what he thinks to be prayer. .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 , .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 .postImageUrl , .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 , .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0:hover , .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0:visited , .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0:active { border:0!important; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0:active , .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0 .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ude304652bb842f477a4321a22ea16da0:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: William Shakespeares Othello Analysis EssayThis is the climax of Hamlet. Claudius is alone, unsuspecting and vulnerable. Hamlet sees this and says to him self, â€Å"Now might I do it pat, now he is praying. And now I’ll do’t. And so he goes to heaven;†¦A villain kills my father; and for that, I, his sole son, do this same villain send to heaven†¦ He took my father grossly, full of bread; with all his crimes broad blown, as flush as May:†¦ No! When he is drunk asleep, or in his rage†¦ or about some act that has no relish of salvation in’t;†¦ And that his soul may be†¦ damned†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (lines 66-87 p. 98). He could have killed him he had the best opportunity but he delayed for in his Christian belief, when one is â€Å"in the purging of his soul† (line 78 p. 198) he will be sent to heaven. Hamlet didn’t want to send Claudius to the eternal paradise his father was deprived of, so Hamlet walks away for a more revengeful event. But the King was not and could not pray hopelessly saying â€Å"My words fly up, my thoughts remain below: / Words without thoughts never to heaven go. † (lines 90-91 p. 198). A missed opportunity. Claudius could not repent for his sins for he did not feel guilty enough to give up his wicked prizes of power, ambition and his brother’s queen. From this point on everything goes down hill. Near the end Hamlet finally realizes his actions have been cowardly delayed. â€Å"How all occasions do inform against me, / and spur my dull revenge! †¦/ Bestial oblivion, or some craven scruple / of thinking too precisely on the event, / a thought which, quartered, hath but one part wisdom / and ever three parts coward,†¦ / Sith I have cause and will and strength and means / to do’t. † (lines 33-46 p. 206). Finally he realizes something about himself. His cowardly reluctance is due to ethical considerations. He is so frustrated with himself he puts all his Christian and moral beliefs aside to avenge his father’s death and swears, â€Å"from this time forth, / My thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth! † (lines65-66 p. 207). In the end it was to late. Hamlet’s delay in action were results of his Christian and moral beliefs and his need to avenge his father’s murder. His procrastination became his downfall leading to the tragic death of his mother, Learertes, Claudius, and himself. Hamlet was the fallen hero that waited to long.